<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Hardly anyone knew who Epsilon was&#8221;: Mentioning Competitors in Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/2011/04/hardly-anyone-knew-who-epsilon-was-mentioning-competitors-in-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/2011/04/hardly-anyone-knew-who-epsilon-was-mentioning-competitors-in-blogs/</link>
	<description>Email marketing and conversion in a cross-channel world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:01:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Epsilon Data Breach Debacle &#171; Life In Motion</title>
		<link>http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/2011/04/hardly-anyone-knew-who-epsilon-was-mentioning-competitors-in-blogs/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>The Epsilon Data Breach Debacle &#171; Life In Motion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 02:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/?p=6#comment-305</guid>
		<description>[...] The result of these issues are due to a data breach at Epsilon, a marketing vendor in charge of email and database marketing. Insiders believe that this data breach that was the result of hackers gaining access to super [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The result of these issues are due to a data breach at Epsilon, a marketing vendor in charge of email and database marketing. Insiders believe that this data breach that was the result of hackers gaining access to super [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-P De Clerck</title>
		<link>http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/2011/04/hardly-anyone-knew-who-epsilon-was-mentioning-competitors-in-blogs/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>J-P De Clerck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/?p=6#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Pete. We&#039;re in full migration from TypePad to Wordpress now but I will surely reply. Scanned your post. Good one. Will explain why I write what I write: it&#039;s not about the breaches as such. Your points on that matter are surely valid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Pete. We&#8217;re in full migration from TypePad to WordPress now but I will surely reply. Scanned your post. Good one. Will explain why I write what I write: it&#8217;s not about the breaches as such. Your points on that matter are surely valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Austin, marketingXD</title>
		<link>http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/2011/04/hardly-anyone-knew-who-epsilon-was-mentioning-competitors-in-blogs/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Austin, marketingXD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/?p=6#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Pot:Kettle. 

Sorry, but the blog post that you complain about was called &quot;Combating Pandora&#039;s Inbox: Email Marketing After the Breach&quot;; yours is the one that mentions Epsilon in the title!

IMO some things are more important than marketing. My main concern is that Silverpop and Epsilon should explain exactly what went wrong, so the rest of us can protect against the right attack scenarios. Currently we all have opinions (mine is at the link) but only a few insiders know for sure:
http://blog.marketingxd.com/post/4305663645/phishing-and-email-preference-centers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pot:Kettle. </p>
<p>Sorry, but the blog post that you complain about was called &#8220;Combating Pandora&#8217;s Inbox: Email Marketing After the Breach&#8221;; yours is the one that mentions Epsilon in the title!</p>
<p>IMO some things are more important than marketing. My main concern is that Silverpop and Epsilon should explain exactly what went wrong, so the rest of us can protect against the right attack scenarios. Currently we all have opinions (mine is at the link) but only a few insiders know for sure:<br />
<a href="http://blog.marketingxd.com/post/4305663645/phishing-and-email-preference-centers" rel="nofollow">http://blog.marketingxd.com/post/4305663645/phishing-and-email-preference-centers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: “Hardly anyone knew who Epsilon was”: Mentioning Competitors in Blogs &#124; Email Marketing Resource</title>
		<link>http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/2011/04/hardly-anyone-knew-who-epsilon-was-mentioning-competitors-in-blogs/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>“Hardly anyone knew who Epsilon was”: Mentioning Competitors in Blogs &#124; Email Marketing Resource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/?p=6#comment-215</guid>
		<description>[...] Read full article   Posted in: Uncategorized [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read full article   Posted in: Uncategorized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ducharme</title>
		<link>http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/2011/04/hardly-anyone-knew-who-epsilon-was-mentioning-competitors-in-blogs/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ducharme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialemailmarketing.eu/?p=6#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Good post JP!

Until it costs corporations dearly for breaches such as this, the situation will likely not improve by much. We all like to think we can self regulate, but the reality is that doesn&#039;t happen very often in any industry.

Consumers either have to accept this kind of thing will happen and there is no such thing as personal data security online or they have to stomp their feet and pressure governments for strong legislation. 

Corporate hive minds have a way of dousing initiatives which are well intentioned, but seen as a cost with no benefit to the bottom line. 

I realize some will claim I&#039;m being cynical, but on the contrary, I&#039;m basing my opinion on corporate track records in this regard.

Regards,
jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post JP!</p>
<p>Until it costs corporations dearly for breaches such as this, the situation will likely not improve by much. We all like to think we can self regulate, but the reality is that doesn&#8217;t happen very often in any industry.</p>
<p>Consumers either have to accept this kind of thing will happen and there is no such thing as personal data security online or they have to stomp their feet and pressure governments for strong legislation. </p>
<p>Corporate hive minds have a way of dousing initiatives which are well intentioned, but seen as a cost with no benefit to the bottom line. </p>
<p>I realize some will claim I&#8217;m being cynical, but on the contrary, I&#8217;m basing my opinion on corporate track records in this regard.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

